Contributed Talk 2: Less is more: Selective advantages can explain the loss of biosynthetic functions in bacteria

Duration: 19 mins 5 secs
Share this media item:
Embed this media item:


About this item
Image inherited from collection
Description: D'Souza, G (Max-Planck-Institut für Chemische Ökologie)
Monday 27 October 2014, 15:00-15:15
 
Created: 2014-10-30 12:53
Collection: Understanding Microbial Communities; Function, Structure and Dynamics
Publisher: Isaac Newton Institute
Copyright: D'Souza, G
Language: eng (English)
Distribution: World     (downloadable)
Explicit content: No
Aspect Ratio: 16:9
Screencast: No
Bumper: UCS Default
Trailer: UCS Default
 
Abstract: Co-authors: Silvio Waschina (Experimental Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745 Jena, Germany; Research Group Theoretical Systems Biology, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany), Christoph Kaleta (Research Group Theoretical Systems Biology, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany), Christian Kost (Experimental Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745 Jena, Germany)

Bacteria that have adapted to nutrient-rich, stable environments are typically characterized by reduced genomes. The loss of biosynthetic genes frequently renders these lineages auxotroph, hinging their survival on an environmental uptake of certain metabolites. However, the factors that govern this ‘genome streamlining’ remain poorly understood. Our analysis of 1532 metabolic networks revealed that auxotrophies are likely to be highly prevalent in both symbiotic and free-living bacteria. To unravel whether selective advantages can account for the rampant loss of anabolic genes, we systematically determined the fitness consequences that result from deleting conditionally essential biosynthetic genes from the genome of Escherichia coli in the presence of the focal nutrient. Pairwise competition experiments with each of 16 mutants auxotrophic for different amino acids, vitamins, and nucleobases against the prototrophic wild type unveiled a pronounced, concentration-dependent growth advantage of around 13% for virtually all mutants tested. Our in silico analysis also suggests that bacteria are frequently auxotrophic for multiple metabolites. Also bacteria are frequently subjected to changes in resource environments. Hence we also determined the effect of different carbon environments and epistasis on the fitness of Escherichia coli genotypes from whose genome one, two, or three different amino acid biosynthesis genes have been deleted. Competition experiments between auxotrophic mutants and prototrophic wild type cells in one of two carbon environments revealed that plasticity and epistasis strongly affected the mutants’ fitness individually and interactively. Taken together, our findings suggest adaptive benefits could drive the loss of conditionally essential biosynthetic genes and that both the genetic background and environmental conditions determine the adaptive value of the loss of these biosynthetic functions.
Available Formats
Format Quality Bitrate Size
MPEG-4 Video 640x360    1.93 Mbits/sec 277.38 MB View Download
WebM 640x360    907.52 kbits/sec 126.84 MB View Download
iPod Video 480x270    522.35 kbits/sec 73.01 MB View Download
MP3 44100 Hz 249.79 kbits/sec 34.94 MB Listen Download
Auto * (Allows browser to choose a format it supports)