Demandingness objections in ethics
Duration: 31 mins 22 secs
Share this media item:
Embed this media item:
Embed this media item:
About this item
| Description: | Paper given by Brian McElwee (University of St. Andrews). Moral theories are frequently rejected on the basis that they are too demanding. I aim to establish what structure convincing demandingness objections must have. Firstly, demandingness objections apply to a theory not primarily in virtue of its ranking of actions, but in virtue of its account of moral requirement. This suggests that theories with consequentialist rankings need not be any more vulnerable to demandingness objections than other plausible moral theories. Secondly, I consider the role that an appeal to cost should have in demandingness objections. I argue that the claim must be understood as an appeal to the costs that the theory calls on moral agents (as opposed to ‘patients’, those affected by the behaviour which the moral theory assesses) to bear. I argue that a plausible account of moral demands must take account of (a) the spontaneous verdicts of our reactive attitudes to agents and (b) typical levels of altruistic motivation. |
|---|
| Created: | 2013-06-21 17:02 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Collection: | Limits of Duty | ||
| Publisher: | University of Cambridge | ||
| Copyright: | Faculty of Philosophy | ||
| Language: | eng (English) | ||
| Distribution: |
World
(downloadable)
|
||
| Keywords: | Philiosophy; Demandingness; Moral theories; | ||
| Credits: |
|
||
| Explicit content: | No | ||