Quantifying Uncertainty in Assessment of Possible Exoplanet Biosignatures

21 mins 37 secs,  124.65 MB,  WebM  1280x720,  25.0 fps,  44100 Hz,  787.33 kbits/sec
Share this media item:
Embed this media item:


About this item
Image inherited from collection
Description: Peter Vickers; Durham University
9 February 2022 – 16:20 to 16:40
 
Created: 2022-02-11 15:13
Collection: The Role of Uncertainty in Mathematical Modelling of Pandemics
Publisher: Isaac Newton Institute
Copyright: Peter Vickers
Language: eng (English)
Distribution: World     (downloadable)
Categories: iTunes - Science
Explicit content: No
Aspect Ratio: 16:9
Screencast: No
Bumper: UCS Default
Trailer: UCS Default
 
Abstract: Suppose the latest generation of telescopes detect oxygen in the atmosphere of an exoplanet. Is that a ‘biosignature’? At one time it would have been called a biosignature (by some, at least), but not now. Now we have plausible abiotic stories to tell about the presence of oxygen in the atmosphere of a planet. But what about a case - such as an oxygen-methane disequilibrium - where we currently do not have a plausible abiotic story to tell? Should we call this a biosignature? Or should we expect that in due course we will develop a plausible abiotic story? In this talk I argue that quantifying the uncertainty requires us to quantify the extent to which we have explored the relevant possibility space, a very difficult thing to do. A Bayesian approach to quantifying the relevant uncertainty seems unhelpful.
Available Formats
Format Quality Bitrate Size
MPEG-4 Video 1280x720    1.54 Mbits/sec 249.70 MB View Download
MPEG-4 Video 640x360    494.15 kbits/sec 78.18 MB View Download
WebM * 1280x720    787.33 kbits/sec 124.65 MB View Download
WebM 640x360    252.62 kbits/sec 40.00 MB View Download
iPod Video 480x270    474.49 kbits/sec 75.07 MB View Download
MP3 44100 Hz 249.81 kbits/sec 39.55 MB Listen Download
Auto (Allows browser to choose a format it supports)